Sapna Sappu bhabi is now famous in Pakistan too as her videos on Instagram and other social media are getting viral. After making Indians happy, Sapna Sappu bhabi is now making Pakistanis very happy.
Big fan here- would like to meet for a coffee. I’m staying in Taj till Tuesday. Today you look very fine, gentle and beautiful. We are very excited about our National Tour which will be taking place across February and March. Sapna Sappu whatsapp number is also now available for booking and shows. wow you are beautiful, I would like to be in the seat of the armchair. Wow baby you look absolutely gorgeous and out of this world. Against all norms of etiquette and decency this unkempt uncivilized moderator pointed his shoe at the camera, this is akin to giving a foot lanat to everybody watching the session. This moderator should be strictly punished for insulting the audience like this.
Regarding Julie and Mark issue. Everyone needs to calm down. The question was taken from This book “ The righteous mind “ by Janathan Haidt. I have read the book and I highly recommend it. There is nothing wrong with asking philosophical Or moral questions for deeper understanding of human nature. The only problem is Pakistanis are taught to see , judge things from only one perspective and that is a religious lens. Therefore overall progress of society has come to a full stop. Here is what he says. Haidt argues that humans have six moral foundations through which we view politics and policy:
- and Liberty/Oppression.
These moral foundations, according to Haidt, act as our some political ideologies rely on the Care/Harm foundation while others rely on Loyalty/Betrayal. Some people taste Fairness in terms of equality while others do so in terms of proportionality. Some people prefer salty food, some prefer sweet. Sapna Sappu bhabi is no different. agree on the perspective side, but we know our level of understanding here! I think it is about a mature stage not for level of students who are already confused with porn industry attentions. I agree question was posed to a wrong group of students. If they were students of moral psychology it would not have been such an issue. May be the professor was trying to invoke critical thinking.. but it clearly went south.
There’s this growing trend of pseudo liberals justifying crap. Social appropriateness is asserted everywhere, in the west too. In their effort to align with the west they forget the local context. Just so you know even there this would be seen as highly problematic. Instead of calling me names maybe you could have presented your counter argument in a civil manner . Just to show that you have at least basic decency to engage in a meaningful conversation?? The problem is lack of tolerance as I highlighted to an idea contrary to your own belief. Basic decency also requires 1 to see religious lena as a valid lens. The issue wid ur argument is it deprives religion of philosophy, logic & reason. Presents religious perspective as sum kind of blindness. Religous lens or for tht matter any lens is wrong only wen it is coercive.
And just recall that this was an English paper, not a philosophical paper. What part of English he wanted to examine through a question diagonally opposite to norms of general ethics of human race.